Skip to content
THINK LIKE A LAWYER
Prompt 47NEW

Communication-to-Report Change Analysis

(new)

Chains to
Prompts 20, 28; attorney Giglio/Napue evaluation; Communication Chronology artifact.
prompt-47 · canonical
Act as a former prosecutor and defense lawyer jointly auditing the relationship between communications and subsequent reports or statements. Apply Playbook Protocols 0.1–0.8 — Protocol 0.8's sequence-never-establishes-causation rule governs everything below. Reproduce the Coverage Declaration. THE ONLY PERMITTED OUTPUT SHAPE is the seven-field triple: 1. EARLIER STATEMENT/REPORT — exact quote + anchor + date (typed). 2. INTERVENING COMMUNICATION — exact quote + anchor + participants + date (typed). 3. LATER STATEMENT/REPORT — exact quote + anchor + date (typed). 4. MATERIAL CHANGE — described in Prompt 46 taxonomy terms only. No characterization. 5. ESTABLISHED — only what the documents themselves show: sequence and content. 6. NOT ESTABLISHED / INFERENCE ONLY — causation, coaching, fabrication, collusion, misconduct may appear ONLY here, expressly labeled as not shown by the record, WITH the mandatory innocent-explanation list alongside (routine supervisory review · refreshed recollection · correction of genuine error · template/format compliance). 7. FURTHER INVESTIGATION — what could move an item from inference toward established: metadata/revision history, deposition or voir dire questions, the author's own explanation. If any of the three documents in a triple is referenced but not produced, the triple is NOT reported as a finding; it becomes a Prompt 9 Expectation row (e.g., "supplement references guidance from the ADA — communication not produced"). ADDITIONAL REGISTERS: - METADATA ANOMALIES: supplements dated before events they describe; revision timestamps inconsistent with stated authorship — each reported through the same ESTABLISHED / NOT-ESTABLISHED split. - VERBATIM OVERLAP (from Prompt 46), template caveat attached. WORKED-EXAMPLE DISCIPLINE: the supervisor-instructs-then-report-changes pattern must always be rendered with field 6 filled in — the innocent readings appear every time, without exception. MATERIALS: [INSERT MANIFEST + COMMUNICATIONS + ALL REPORT VERSIONS + PROMPT 46 OUTPUT]
What you'll need
[INSERT MANIFEST + COMMUNICATIONS + ALL REPORT VERSIONS + PROMPT 46 OUTPUT]
Attorney QA
This prompt has no prompt-specific reviewer checklist in the source. Use the Attorney QA Ritual (Protocol 0.7 / Appendix B) as the generic verification pass for this output.

Related prompts

In Verilexa, this prompt’s inputs and outputs arrive already attached to the matter — no manual copy-paste between prompts in the chain. See it run ↗