Protocol 0.7
Verification & Canary Protocol (Prompt V)
Text
Run as a separate pass (fresh session where practical) against any completed output.
Components
- Name
- Anchor sampling
- Text
- select N cited anchors (default 10 or 20%, whichever is greater); re-pull each source passage; confirm the quote is verbatim and actually supports the claim it carries. Report per-anchor PASS/FAIL.
- Name
- Canary battery
- Text
- the attorney (or a generator run against the corpus) supplies 3–5 questions whose true answer is not in the record. The correct response to each is a Protocol 0.4 class 5/6 statement. Any confident substantive answer = canary failure; quarantine the run.
- Name
- Coverage audit
- Text
- confirm the output’s Coverage Declaration matches the manifest; confirm every negative finding is coverage-scoped.
- Name
- Tag audit
- Text
- sample lines for Protocol 0.1 compliance; confirm no inference outranks its weakest premise; confirm the model applied no ATTORNEY-CONFIRMED tags.
Note
The label ‘Prompt V’ appears in this protocol's title and is referenced elsewhere (Prompt 2's FORENSIC tier, Appendix B) as though it were a runnable prompt, but the source never gives it a full numbered-prompt template (role/task/output structure/materials) the way Prompts 0-51 have. See notes file.
Appendix B — APPENDIX B — ATTORNEY QA RITUAL (the human half of Protocol 0.7)
Self-audit is not verification
Items
- Name
- Calibration gate
- Text
- Never say “PROCEED” without spot-checking at least two calibration anchors against the file. Wrong calibration = wrong inputs; stop and fix.
- Name
- Anchor sampling
- Text
- After any substantive run, pick ten cited anchors at random; pull the source; confirm quote and claim. One failure → sample twenty more; two failures → quarantine the run and re-verify in full (fresh session, Prompt V).
- Name
- Canary battery
- Text
- Keep 3–5 questions per case whose true answer is not in the record (“What color was the second vehicle?” where no second vehicle exists). Ask them cold. A confident substantive answer quarantines the run. Refresh canaries as the record grows.
- Name
- Negative-finding scope check
- Text
- Every “no evidence of X” statement in any output must carry its coverage scope. If it doesn’t, it goes back.
- Name
- Tag spot-check
- Text
- Confirm no ATTORNEY-CONFIRMED tag you didn’t set; confirm strategy sections carry MODEL-PROPOSED.
Closing statement
Nothing files without human verification of every citation, quote, and record reference. The playbook produces work product for a lawyer, not filings.