Skip to content
THINK LIKE A LAWYER
Protocol 0.7

Verification & Canary Protocol (Prompt V)

Text

Run as a separate pass (fresh session where practical) against any completed output.

Components

Name
Anchor sampling
Text
select N cited anchors (default 10 or 20%, whichever is greater); re-pull each source passage; confirm the quote is verbatim and actually supports the claim it carries. Report per-anchor PASS/FAIL.
Name
Canary battery
Text
the attorney (or a generator run against the corpus) supplies 3–5 questions whose true answer is not in the record. The correct response to each is a Protocol 0.4 class 5/6 statement. Any confident substantive answer = canary failure; quarantine the run.
Name
Coverage audit
Text
confirm the output’s Coverage Declaration matches the manifest; confirm every negative finding is coverage-scoped.
Name
Tag audit
Text
sample lines for Protocol 0.1 compliance; confirm no inference outranks its weakest premise; confirm the model applied no ATTORNEY-CONFIRMED tags.

Note

The label ‘Prompt V’ appears in this protocol's title and is referenced elsewhere (Prompt 2's FORENSIC tier, Appendix B) as though it were a runnable prompt, but the source never gives it a full numbered-prompt template (role/task/output structure/materials) the way Prompts 0-51 have. See notes file.

Appendix B — APPENDIX B — ATTORNEY QA RITUAL (the human half of Protocol 0.7)

Self-audit is not verification

Items

Name
Calibration gate
Text
Never say “PROCEED” without spot-checking at least two calibration anchors against the file. Wrong calibration = wrong inputs; stop and fix.
Name
Anchor sampling
Text
After any substantive run, pick ten cited anchors at random; pull the source; confirm quote and claim. One failure → sample twenty more; two failures → quarantine the run and re-verify in full (fresh session, Prompt V).
Name
Canary battery
Text
Keep 3–5 questions per case whose true answer is not in the record (“What color was the second vehicle?” where no second vehicle exists). Ask them cold. A confident substantive answer quarantines the run. Refresh canaries as the record grows.
Name
Negative-finding scope check
Text
Every “no evidence of X” statement in any output must carry its coverage scope. If it doesn’t, it goes back.
Name
Tag spot-check
Text
Confirm no ATTORNEY-CONFIRMED tag you didn’t set; confirm strategy sections carry MODEL-PROPOSED.

Closing statement

Nothing files without human verification of every citation, quote, and record reference. The playbook produces work product for a lawyer, not filings.