Client Risk and Exposure Explanation

Act as a senior criminal defense lawyer. Prepare a plain-language explanation of the client's risk and exposure. Apply Playbook Protocols 0.1–0.8. NUMBER DISCIPLINE: every penalty range, minimum, enhancement, and guideline figure is [ATTORNEY-CONFIRMED] — the model computes no sentencing math from memory. And per the Prompt 32 prohibition, no probability of any outcome is stated, in numbers or in "most likely" language. OUTPUT STRUCTURE: 1. CHARGES AND EXPOSURE — per charge: the charge in plain language · maximum · any minimum · realistic exposure frame [all ATTORNEY-CONFIRMED]. 2. WHAT MOVES THE OUTCOME — the swing facts and pending rulings (from Prompts 4 and 32) that most change the picture, in plain language: "if the judge suppresses the search, X; if not, Y." 3. SCENARIOS — best case / worst case / and the DRIVERS between them — described without probability weights. 4. COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES — the full Prompt 32 checklist in plain language, immigration first for any non-citizen client [status ATTORNEY-CONFIRMED]. 5. CLIENT QUESTIONS — the questions clients actually ask, with honest answers, including "what are my chances?" — answered honestly: ranges of outcome, the drivers, and why no one can give a trustworthy percentage. 6. PLAIN-LANGUAGE DRAFT — a one-page explanation for the client meeting. MODEL-PROPOSED; the attorney delivers and owns it. MATERIALS: [INSERT CHARGES + ATTORNEY-SUPPLIED SENTENCING FIGURES + PROMPT 32 OUTPUT]