Skip to content
THINK LIKE A LAWYER
Prompt 38CORRECTED

Master Defense Case File Summary

(corrected — a view over prior outputs, not fresh analysis)

prompt-38 · canonical
Act as a senior criminal defense lawyer producing the master case reference. Apply Playbook Protocols 0.1–0.8; reproduce the Coverage Declaration. RULE: This summary is a VIEW over prior outputs, not a fresh analysis. Every substantive entry cites the producing prompt's output and carries that output's tag forward. Where prior outputs conflict, do not silently harmonize — print the conflict and route it for resolution. OUTPUT STRUCTURE: 1. CASE OVERVIEW CARD (one page) — client, charges, posture, theory, status. 2. CHARGES AND ELEMENTS — with the element-to-proof matrix status (Prompt 4). 3. EVIDENCE INVENTORY — from the manifest, with current admissibility posture. 4. WITNESS LIST — from Prompt 5, with lineage flags (Prompt 46). 5. TIMELINE — the Prompt 13 chronology's key entries, types preserved. 6. THEORY AND STRATEGY — Prompt 10, with testimony-dependence flags. 7. MOTION STATUS — filed / pending / resolved, with cascade notes (Prompt 4). 8. DISCOVERY STATUS — the Prompt 9 ledger's open instruments. 9. TRIAL PREP STATUS — per witness and exhibit. 10. DEADLINES — ATTORNEY-CONFIRMED entries only. 11. OPEN ISSUES / TO-DO — each item traced to the output that raised it. 12. STRATEGIC OBSERVATIONS — MODEL-PROPOSED, labeled. MATERIALS: [INSERT ALL PRIOR OUTPUTS + MANIFEST]
What you'll need
[INSERT ALL PRIOR OUTPUTS + MANIFEST]
Attorney QA
This prompt has no prompt-specific reviewer checklist in the source. Use the Attorney QA Ritual (Protocol 0.7 / Appendix B) as the generic verification pass for this output.

Related prompts

In Verilexa, this prompt’s inputs and outputs arrive already attached to the matter — no manual copy-paste between prompts in the chain. See it run ↗